首页> 外文OA文献 >Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Penerima Fidusia Atas Jaminan Berupa Piutang Berdasarkan Surat Daftar Piutang yang Dibuat oleh Pemberi Fidusia (Studi terhadap Pasal 9 Undang-undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia)
【2h】

Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Penerima Fidusia Atas Jaminan Berupa Piutang Berdasarkan Surat Daftar Piutang yang Dibuat oleh Pemberi Fidusia (Studi terhadap Pasal 9 Undang-undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia)

机译:应收款形式的应收账款形式对应收抵押品的受信人的法律保护(关于信托担保的第42号法律,1999年第9条)

摘要

Accounts Receivable as one of the fiduciary collaterals has been regulated in Law No. 42 of 1999 Article 9 concerning Fiduciary Collateral. However, the regulation is still powerless in providing legal certainty for creditor as the fiduciary acceptor who uses accounts receivable as fiduciary collateral. It occurs since not only it raises legal obscurity, but the law also has no certain further arrangements (uncompletely norm). As for the goals is to be able to analyze the legal protection for the fiduciary acceptor who uses accounts receivable as her/his collateral based on Accounts Receivable Collection Letter which is created by the fiduciary issuer as amended in Law No. 42 of 1999 Article 9 concerning Fiduciary Collateral and to be able to analyze and find the construction of legal protection will be in the future for the fiduciary acceptor who uses Accounts Receivable as her/his collateral. Juridical normative method with statute approach and conceptual approach are applied as the research methodologies for this study, which then will be analyzed by using prescriptive method. By using those methodologies, it can be identified that the Law No. 42 of 1999 Article 9 is indeed has legal obscurity regarding the credit objects as fiduciary collateral. Besides, obscurity also occurs on the AR Collection Letters made by the fiduciary issuer and the clause regarding the implementation of AR for the third party. As the consequence, various legal interpretations raise and give impact to creditor who becomes the fiduciary acceptor as he/she does not get a favorable law protection and might undergo a potential loss in the future. Derived from the writer\u27s interpretation, it can be concluded that creditor as the fiduciary acceptor needs legal certainty and legal protection in preventive way, in which it can be realized by doing a reconstruction towards the Law No. 42 of 1999 Article 9 concerning credit / accounts receivable as fiduciary collateral. Furthermore, constructing an appropriate legal protection for the fiduciary acceptor of credit / AR is also required. It can be applied by using a constriction method or in other words Rechtsvervijnings, which can be put on Government Regulation.
机译:作为信托抵押品之一的应收账款已在1999年第42号法律(关于信托抵押品)中进行了规定。但是,该法规仍然无法为债权人提供法律确定性,使他们将应收账款用作信托抵押品。之所以会发生这种情况,是因为它不仅增加了法律上的模糊性,而且法律也没有某些进一步的安排(不完全规范)。至于目标是能够根据受托发行人根据1999年第42号法律第9条修订的应收账款催收信,分析将应收账款用作抵押的受托人的法律保护。将来,对于使用应收帐款作为其抵押品的信托承兑人,能够分析并找到法律保护的构造,将成为未来的难题。本研究采用法律规约法和概念法的法学规范方法,然后采用规范性方法进行分析。通过使用这些方法,可以确定1999年第42号法律第9条的确存在对信用对象作为信托抵押品的法律隐晦之处。此外,受托发行人开具的应收账款催收函以及与第三方实施应收账款有关的条款中也有含糊之处。结果,各种法律解释引起了债权人的利益,并对其产生影响,因为他/她没有得到有利的法律​​保护,并且将来可能遭受潜在损失。从作者的解释得出,可以得出结论,债权人作为信托承兑人需要预防性的法律确定性和法律保护,可以通过对1999年第42号法令第9条进行重构来实现这一点。 /应收账款作为信托抵押。此外,还需要为信用/ AR的受托人建立适当的法律保护。可以使用收缩方法或换句话说,可以将其应用到政府法规中。

著录项

  • 作者

    Anggun, Windy Permata;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 ID
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号